Fighting misogyny, one article of clothing at a time

September 16, 2015 by Bill Ivey

So it only took one Kentucky school district two days to send the first student home for a dress code violation. Surprise of surprises, it was a girl. Her violation was wearing a tank top with a cardigan (which would be within the Stoneleigh-Burnham dress code), which meant her collarbone was not covered up, which meant she was potentially distracting boys. (Kim) To principal Rob Akers’s credit, he agreed to meet with a group of students, and they’ve come up with proposed changes to the dress code that went before the school board two days ago (Ilyashov & Woodford County High School). Reportedly, a committee is seeking additional input, and will bring the proposal back before the Board next Monday.

Filed Under: social justice, feminist dress code, Feminism, Education, feminist school

Just Stop

April 30, 2015 by Bill Ivey

“Bam! Bam! Bam bam bam!” - Bamm-Bamm Rubble

That’s what I felt like late last night as I saw first one and then another and then yet another link to stories about people looking down their noses at girls, judging what they’re wearing, and then judging them. The extreme disparities in the three examples only added to the shock.

Let’s start with Jef Rouner’s daughter. He sent her off to school one morning in a new dress, only to learn that “school officials were bothered by her bare shoulders so they forced her to cover them up” (Foster) by wearing a t-shirt over it. In addition, she was also forced to wear jeans under the dress “because the little bit of ankle showing bothered them as well.” (Foster)

And, oh yeah, she’s five years old. Let that sink in for a moment.

Filed Under: LGBT Support, feminist dress code, Feminism, religious freedom

Feminist Dress Code

September 28, 2013 by Bill Ivey

During the course of the summer, as a frequent Twitter user, I read innumerable posts on girls and women, what they wear, what it means, and what it ought to mean. A number of websites specifically questioned school dress codes, claiming they were belittling to girls - and, for that matter, boys - in the assumptions underlying restrictions on clothing for girls. Those assumptions might include the motivations of girls for making certain choices, the reactions of boys to those choices, and where the responsibility lies in that interplay. Culture plays a role in those assumptions, of course, but in general the majority of people in our society tend to associate revealing clothing with deliberate sexualization, assume that boys will be distracted in those cases, and ascribe responsibility to girls for their original clothing choices.

Filed Under: dress code, On Education, student government, feminist dress code, Women in media, girls' school